Research-to-decision

Research that can be reconstructed after the decision.

Most firms can show the final decision. Fewer can reconstruct the thesis, data snapshot, screen, score, regime context, monitor rule and watchlist state that led to it. QJ is built to keep that path inspectable.

Instrument Master Identity
Warehouse Facts + compute
User State Decisions
Audit Evidence

What this solves

  • Research-production drift.
  • Lost thesis assumptions.
  • Unreviewed regime changes.
  • Screens that cannot be replayed.
  • Watchlists without decision context.
  • Investment committee packs assembled by hand.

Current foundation

Core QJ pieces

ICDL

Investment concept definition language.

Thesis engine

Research definitions become scored decision candidates.

Scoring

Single scoring layer for candidate ranking.

Regime

Macro and regime outputs consumed by decision workflows.

Monitor

Watch-and-fire predicate engine.

Watchlists

Pre-trade decision artifacts in User State.

End-to-end workflow

One thesis from definition to Decision Packet.

A thesis enters QJ as an ICDL definition. It is scored against warehouse facts, connected to regime context, monitored against defined falsifiers, and promoted to a watchlist or Decision Packet when the conditions warrant. Six months later, the thesis record, the data snapshot and the decision evidence are still queryable.

Product proof

Show the evidence, not only the promise.

Screener and ranked market data
Ranked research surfaces should become governed decision inputs.

Next step

Walk through a thesis workflow.

Review a research-to-decision path end to end.

Request Demo